Report published reviewing ‘confusing’ and ‘challenging’ property income tax rules

A report published by the Office of Tax Simplification reviews ‘confusing’ and ‘challenging’ property income tax rules.

A report by the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) on the Income Tax rules for residential property income explores the common complexities, issues, and concerns facing taxpayers and outlines several key recommendations for change.

In the summer, Propertymark responded to the OTS’s request to seek views on how the taxation of property income could be simplified. With taxation being a key topic of contention for Propertymark members, the industry body conveyed the frustration from agents around how the current tax regime does not serve the sector’s best interests.

Landlords renting properties in the private rented sector have seen their tax burden increase in recent years, including:
    • higher rates of property taxes on buy-to-let properties
    • withdrawal of tax relief on mortgage interest costs and replacement with a 20 per cent tax credit
    • removal of the 10 per cent Wear and Tear Allowance for fully furnished properties being replaced with an at-cost relief
    • maintaining Capital Gains Tax (CGT) for rented property at 28 per cent, when it was reduced to 18 per cent for other assets
    • a planned rise in corporation tax from 19 per cent to 25 per cent from 2023.

The report covers the confusion and challenge raised about the allocation of income between joint owners, and in relation to rules which cause significant distortions or complexity.

It was noted in the report the importance of HMRC accepting multiple professionals to help with the new tax filings and recommends that HMRC should not go ahead with Making Tax Digital until these issues have been resolved.

In its consultation response, Propertymark argued that the tax system is too complex for landlords but said it was pleased to see the report recommending that HMRC make it easier for landlords to register for and report their income online for UK tax purposes and questions whether the initial and medium-term threshold for entry into the new system should be increased above £10,000.

Propertymark also went on to say that there have been instances where landlords do not know where and how to pay the taxes they owe. Landlords in self-manged properties and tenants who have to deduct tax from their rent do not always declare their income, therefore putting significant pressure on agents to ensure that tenants and landlords are compliant.

Although the furnished holiday lettings regime can provide some tax benefits, Propertymark said that this it is not widely used and adds a complex layer to the tax rules which apply to property income and that the UK Government should consider the need for a separate tax regime for furnished short-term lets as it gives certain tax advantages over the wider residential property income rules due to the industry body believing that this disincentivises using properties for the PRS.

https://www.propertymark.co.uk/resource/consultation-office-of-tax-simplification-property-income-review.html

Report published reviewing ‘confusing’ and ‘challenging’ property income tax rules

Timothy Douglas

Timothy Douglas, Head of Policy and Campaigns, comments:

“Our members tell us that the taxation system is not working, the right incentives are not in place and too many costs are being put on landlords and letting agents, which are ultimately passed on to tenants through higher rents.

“Propertymark believe that the current tax system is too complex for landlords and by digitalising the process, will allow other professionals who are better placed, such as bookkeepers to provide this service on behalf of landlords.

“The sector needs a tax regime that promotes an environment where landlords benefit from investing in property rather than acting as a further deterrent to leave the sector or not grow their portfolios.”

Propertymark called for clearer information and tax deductions on improvements in the PRS. The OTS’s report support Propertymark’s calls, stating that there is confusion between what is a repair (tax deductible) or an improvement (not). As well as creating a broader tax relief for all property costs other than where work is part of the capital cost of the building. This could help to encourage improvements to be made to property to support forthcoming higher energy efficiency improvements for the private rented sector.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ots-review-of-residential-property-income

 

Kindly shared by Propertymark

Main photo courtesy of Pixabay